![]() |
|
![]() David Posthuma
![]() ![]() Categories![]() ![]() Archives![]()
|
|||||
A Spiritual Formation Ministry Model for the Local Church
David Posthuma @ Oct 20, 2005 02:04 PM
Jerry: You had asked me for input on your sermon diagram. What I wish to offer you is not intended in any way as a critique of your “Purpose-Driven” mission model, but I hope to offer an entirely different perspective on the purpose of the Church. My perspective is no more valid than your perspective…it’s just different. What I share with you is a glimpse into my own spiritual journey. Take what I offer you to God and see what He says about it. For many years I had been a proponent of the Saddleback Purpose-Driven model because it at least articulated a crude spiritual formation ministry model. I define spiritual formation as “Intentionally Helping People Grow from Spiritual Seekers into Spiritual Leaders”. However, over the years, I have begun to look at this process much less from a systematic programmed perspective as illustrated by Saddleback, and much more from the perspective of being the Holy Spirit’s “assistants” in the process that He initiated and promises to bring to completion (Hebrews 12:2). I start at the same point that you have started, namely the “greatest commandment”. But rather than define the greatest commandment as all-inclusive “Worship”, I have begun to wonder if God was describing for humanity a spiritual formation process. I would modify your “Love God” graphic accordingly:
It is interesting to me that Jesus referred to people as differing soils and that only the well tilled soil was prepared to receive the gospel message and was able to grow and bear fruit up to a hundred-fold harvest (Matthew 13:3-8; 18-23). With this parable in mind, I then ask pastors to answer the following questions: 1) What is your ministry doing to intentionally help people till and prepare their spirit to be receptive to God? 2) What is your ministry doing to intentionally help people till and prepare their emotional-self so that they may form a healthy relationship with God and with one another? 3) What is your ministry doing to intentionally help people till and prepare their minds, with the renewing of their minds, so that they can think and reason according to the Scriptures? 4) What is your ministry doing to intentionally help people till and prepare for life application and ministry service? Many pastors do not know how to answer these four questions because they tend to think and plan from an institution perspective rather than from a spiritual formation perspective. The goal of the institutional perspective is “how can we get more people to serve more”. The goal of the spiritual formation perspective is “how can we get more people to grow more?” The institutional perspective tends to believe that people will grow through personal service so there is very little training or equipping that is necessary. The spiritual formation perspective believes that healthy service is only possible as people are equipped, prepared, and tested for ministry. Depending upon the perspective selected, the impact upon your programming structure will be significant. The institutional perspective typically places a heavy emphasis upon the Sunday worship event, small groups and a few simple classes. This is a fast-paced model designed to process many people quickly. Ministries applying this perspective tend to grow quickly but have shallow spiritual roots. The spiritual formation perspective will place a much higher emphasis upon mentorship, modeling, and training. This is a time-intensive model designed to nurture people through the seasons of life…much like a plant takes time to root, grow, mature and bear fruit (In the case of a vineyard, it may take years and requires pruning and care). Ministries that apply this perspective tend to start more slowly, but if they have a clear and intentional spiritual formation plan, they can grow even greater in ministry impact because they ultimately have more equipped and mature “ministers” to go around. It is also interesting to me that the institutional perspective will typically compartmentalize Worship, Evangelism, Discipleship, Service and Fellowship…with references to Fellowship often directing people back to the institutional organization and its small groups. The spiritual formation perspective tends to view ministry as less compartmentalized and more “relational”. In fact, you can boil everything down to one concept: “Disciple-Making”. Disciple-Making is evangelism, fellowship, equipping, and worship. It is hard to separate out these elements in the spiritual formation/disciple-making process. If we use Jesus and his disciples as our model, when was Jesus leading the disciples in worship? In fellowship? In Equipping? In Evangelism? For the most part it appears that it was all happening at the same time throughout the course of sharing life together. We also observe that only after considerable investment did Jesus send his disciples out to do ministry, and then he sent them in teams of two with very specific faith-building instructions. You can observe within E-Church Essentials an application of the spiritual formation philosophy as our system is indeed designed to support Evangelism, Discipleship, Fellowship and Equipping for Ministry. However, the various system tools are not clearly compartmentalized according to these Biblical mission objectives. Furthermore, the focus of the program is really intended to help develop people rather than build the structures of an institution. Certainly the institutional model ministry can use our system, and they do, but my goal is to encourage a movement back to spiritual mentorship which was a prevailing ministry paradigm within the Jesus Movement of the 1960’s and 1970’s, the preferred postmodern ministry philosophy, and the model Christ gave to the church within Gospels. I would tend to apply the spiritual formation model within a church setting using the following chart:
The programming structure of the church might involve the following demands upon its people:
These demands are no greater than typically asked by churches utilizing the institutional model, but I believe the results will be far greater spiritual maturity, deeper and more authentic relationships, and healthier ministry service.
Postmodernism...Standing on Feet of Clay?
David Posthuma @ Mar 4, 2005 02:14 PM
Postmodernism…
Standing on Feet of ClayThe Road Map The postmodern era holds incredible potential for local and global ministry. Never before have Christians been so open to personal involvement in ministry, nor has the Church been so receptive to non-traditional ministry paradigms…in particular, ministry paradigms that involve the use of technology. This “openness” is not by accident. God has been guiding the development of His Church through many historic eras and through many changes. I now believe that we are in the final era of the Church: Postmodernism. I would like to explore with the Christ community an alternative interpretation of Daniel’s vision of a statue found in Daniel 2. I believe this vision may hold an explanation of how God intends His Church to expand its ministry impact in the postmodern era. Theologians have always struggled with how to interpret the five segments of Daniel’s statue. The primary theological issue is: if the vision is interpreted from the perspective of “financial value”, then each succeeding kingdom is inferior to its predecessor. But when we look at cultural development, one is hard-pressed to say that the Western culture today is inferior to the culture of The alternate interpretation I propose for consideration does not suffer from the “degradation of society” issue, and describes for us the primary cultural trends within each era. I believe we should view the various layers within the statue as the elements that drive the social-economic engine of each era. The Era of GOLD – the root of the word The Era of SILVER- the Biblical text is clear that the dominion following The Era of BRONZE – The Bronze phase of the statue cannot reference the “Bronze Age” which occurred approximately 2,500 BC. However, according to the Trade and Environmental Database (TED), the The Era of IRON – The smelting of iron had been established prior to the Just as the era of Bronze was a mixture of philosophies and cultures, so now the era of Iron will crush and dominate all other kingdoms. With the development of the Industrial age, sociologists began to refer to countries as having First world, This “crushing and breaking” was not restricted to militarism. The dominance of the Yet it was during the era of Iron that the cultures of the earth made many significant technological achievements that helped promote the spreading of the Gospel of Jesus Christ throughout the World. Achievements in communication and travel made this planet smaller than ever before. The Era of IRON & CLAY – This is the era on which I would like to focus our attention, because I believe it is the era in which we now exist…the postmodern age...the age of clay feet. The Era of Iron & Clay is a mixture of two societal dynamics that do not mix well…in fact, according to Daniel, after co-existing for a time, the two societal dynamics will indeed split in two…just prior to Christ establishing His Kingdom that shall never end. Iron is clearly a remnant of the Industrial age. In particular, those Second and The Hebrew word for “Clay” can also mean “dirt” or “ground”. Until 1947, the reference to “clay” could only be interpreted a “brittle” or “weak”. However, on As an example of this division: the Conclusion: So what practical value can be gleaned from this re-interpretation of Daniel’s vision? Primarily… the understanding that God has always used the significant societal and cultural stages of development to help accomplish His plans and purposes. Secondarily, that if we want to be effective and relevant within our present culture for the sake of Christ and His Kingdom, we must learn to adapt our ministry methodologies to the current cultural trend. Let’s now list how God used the cultural trends depicted in Daniel’s vision: 1) God used the Babylon Age (Era of Gold) to discipline and train His people 2) God use Persian Age (Era of Silver) to free 3) God used the Roman Age (The Era of Bronze) in which to insert Christ into this world, and to use the Roman societal structures and mechanisms to promulgate the Gospel throughout the known world. 4) God used the modern Industrial Age (Era of Iron) to shrink the world, providing advances in transportation and communication so that the Gospel of Christ could reach to the far corners of the world. 5) God is using the present postmodern Information Age (Era of Clay & Iron) to enable global communication of the gospel as never before possible. 6) Based upon how God used previous cultural eras to accomplish his plans, we can anticipate a full integration of ministry with technology in the era of pure Clay to help communicate the Gospel of Christ. If a ministry seeks to have a powerful impact within the present postmodern culture, it must adopt and adapt the very societal engines that drive the present culture, and use those same engines for the sake of the Kingdom. In the Information age, this means that it is now time to give birth to the eChurch. The Church must embrace information technology, not resist it as “non-relational”. Technology cannot, and should not, replace authentic Christ-centered relationships. However, within the Information Age, the nature and forms that relationships may take will look very different than in the modern era. Unfortunately, Iron and Clay cannot mix for long. I fear that some ministries will move forward to becoming fully “Churches of Clay”, while many more will resist change and remain “Churches of Iron”. Iron era Churches are appropriate within an Iron era culture. But such churches are wholly irrelevant to a clay era culture. How do you describe your ministry? Are you… 1) A ministry of Iron? 2) A ministry of Iron & Clay? 3) A ministry of Clay? According to Daniel, Christ’s return will follow the separation of the Clay dominion from the Iron dominion. In the short period between now and that time, what is your ministry doing to be more effective in the Era of Clay? A truly postmodern ministry will stand on feet of clay. |